MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3192727496

Geolocating and Mosaicking Airborne Infrared Video for Wildfire Risk Analysis over Time without IMU Information

2019· article· en· W3192727496 on OpenAlex
Tomas Naprstek, Gabriela Ifimov, George Leblanc, M. D. Lee, J. Pablo Arroyo‐Mora, Joshua M. Johnston

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueNPARC · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFire Detection and Safety Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRemote sensingInertial measurement unitEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyComputer scienceComputer visionGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Airborne infrared (IR) surveys of wildfires allow for quantifying the energy produced by a fire, which can be used in wildfire risk management. If several flights are completed across the same location over time, the evolution of the burn can also be analyzed. However, for this to be done, accurate geolocation of the imagery must be completed. Once the images are geolocated, additional products such as a mosaic can be produced, which in turn can be used for further analysis or to validate satellite products. These are common tasks across most airborne remote sensing data, whose approaches are often highly dependent on how the data were collected, and what associated positional (GPS and IMU) information is available. Here we show a simple yet effective method using a mid-wave (3-5um) IR FLIR SC8300 camera's video, for cases when IMU data is not recorded. Our study is based on a series of surveys flown over a naturally-occurring wildfire in northern Ontario, Canada. These data were collected at different times of day over a 48 hour period, resulting in imagery that records the development of the wildfire. Additionally, four integration times (ITs) were concurrently collected to ensure the broad spectrum of temperatures could be properly measured. To compare and analyse the datasets, we developed a custom solution to geolocate and mosaic the videos using Matlab. Our solution is a simple and flexible method that computes an iterative frame registration followed by mosaicking using a grid-based approach. One of the key reasons for this custom development was to ensure that all ITs could be correctly mosaicked. The shorter ITs offer very little background information to use as points of interest (POIs) to work with for frame registration, as they are only effective at very high temperatures. Therefore, we developed this method to allow the shorter ITs to utilize the same registration transformations as calculated from the longest IT data, which contained many more POIs, such as surrounding rivers. We show results for wildfire imagery collected during an afternoon flight and a night flight with 1m resolution, as well as our final processed imagery, which was georeferenced to GeoEye satellite imagery using ArcGIS 10.6 and ENVI 5.5 to further improve accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.680
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it