MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193150665 · doi:10.1029/2020jb020562

Three‐Dimensional Inversion of Magnetotelluric Data for a Resistivity Model With Arbitrary Anisotropy

2021· article· en· W3193150665 on OpenAlex
Wenxin Kong, Handong Tan, Changhong Lin, Martyn Unsworth, Benjamin Lee, Miao Peng, Mao Wang, Tuo Tong

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAnisotropyMagnetotelluricsIsotropyInversion (geology)Electrical resistivity and conductivityGeologyGeophysicsSynthetic dataAlgorithmPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Electrical anisotropy is increasingly recognized as an important aspect of the resistivity models required to explain magnetotelluric (MT) observations. However, a limited number of practical MT inversion algorithms that can consider anisotropy have been published to date. To address this problem, we have developed a three‐dimensional (3‐D) MT inversion algorithm that recovers a 3‐D resistivity model that considers arbitrary electrical anisotropy. The inversion uses the same inversion algorithm as the widely used ModEM inversion algorithm, and a novel forward modeling algorithm to consider the anisotropic Earth. The algorithm was tested on both synthetic and field MT data. Inversions considered both a completely general anisotropy tensor with six components and approximations with less parameters. Synthetic inversions show that the two horizontal components of resistivity and the anisotropy strike can be well recovered, while the vertical component of resistivity is poorly resolved, primarily because current flow in MTs is dominantly horizontal. The synthetic examples confirm the limitation of the axial anisotropic inversion technique when applied to MT data produced by a resistivity model with arbitrary anisotropy. The synthetic inversions also showed that inversion of data from an isotropic model will not result in an artificially anisotropic model. Compared to the isotropic inversion model of the real MT data, the anisotropic model clearly shows some features that are consistent with the mapped geology. As expected, the results showed that a given data set can be fit by a range of models, with an inherent trade‐off from 3‐D heterogeneity to 3‐D anisotropy. This uncertainty can be reduced with the use of prior information in the inversion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.862
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.094
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it