MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3193329895 · doi:10.1016/j.rec.2021.07.010

Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas

2021· article· es· W3193329895 on OpenAlexaff
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth Loder, Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoOttawa Public HealthMcMaster UniversityCanada Research ChairsOttawa HospitalImpactWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsChecklistSystematic reviewGuidelineTerminologyStatement (logic)Presentation (obstetrics)PsychologyMEDLINEMedical educationLibrary scienceMedicineComputer sciencePolitical scienceLinguisticsPathologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OpenAlex records an abstract for this work, but it could not be fetched just now.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.461
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.810
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesMetaresearch
DomainCandidate signal: Reporting · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.665

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.4610.810
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0050.012
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0120.018
Bibliometrics0.0360.032
Science and technology studies0.0050.010
Scholarly communication0.0300.014
Open science0.0140.019
Research integrity0.0160.023
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1450.066

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.220
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
DomainReporting
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1,195
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Española de Cardiología (English Edition)→Same topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews→French-language works237,207→