Thallium Isotopic Compositions in Hawaiian Lavas: Evidence for Recycled Materials on the Kea Side of the Hawaiian Mantle Plume
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Hawaiian volcanoes record 6 Ma of potentially deep mantle chemistry and form two parallel volcanic chains that are geochemically unique, named Loa and Kea. Loa volcanoes erupt lavas with isotopically enriched compositions thought to reflect the presence of recycled material in the deep mantle source of the Hawaiian plume. Variations in stable thallium (Tl) isotopes have been used to trace recycled pelagic ocean sediment from subduction to eruption in arc and intraplate lavas. Previous work attributed heavy Tl isotopic compositions in eight Loa samples to recycled sediments in their source. We reexamined this hypothesis using a large sample set (n = 34) of shield‐stage, tholeiitic basalt from 13 Hawaiian volcanoes representing the entire range of isotopically enriched and depleted compositions along the Hawaiian chain. Samples were acid‐leached prior to isotopic analysis to remove post‐eruption alteration and resulting ε205Tl values show statistical differences between Loa and Kea volcanoes. Corresponding isotopic data and re‐analyzed trace element concentrations suggest that the ε205Tl values are primary magmatic signatures. Possible co‐variations between heavy ε205Tl and oxygen isotopes in samples from Kea‐trend volcanoes could reflect the presence of ancient, recycled pelagic sediment on the Kea side of the Hawaiian plume, which samples the average deep Pacific mantle. As such, the deep mantle source of both Loa and Kea Hawaiian volcanoes may contain recycled materials of different natures and recycling histories, which supports work from both geophysical and geochemical studies suggesting that the Earth's lower mantle is chemically heterogeneous on multiple spatial scales.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".