Efficacy of nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation on health care behaviours in adults with chronic heart failure: An experimental design
Bibliographic record
Abstract
IntroductionNonadherence and poor health care behaviors contribute to worsening of heart failure symptoms, in many cases leading to increased morbidity and mortality.AimTo assess the efficacy of nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation on health care behaviours in adults with chronic heart failure. Method. An experimental design was conducted in India from January to December of 2019. A sample size of 200 adults with heart failure from a tertiary cardiac care center was enrolled. Participants were allocated into an intervention group (n = 100) and a control group (n = 100). A nurse-led cardiac rehabilitation program using a virtual educational video and reminder telephone calls was given to the intervention group for six months. A modified heart failure adherence and health care behaviours scale was used.Results78% of the adults in the intervention group and 79% of the adults in the control group were males. 43% of the adults in the intervention group and 32% of the adults in the control group had ≥2 years of chronic heart failure. 42.27% of the participants in the intervention group and 35.05% of the adults in the control group indicated that medical follow-ups were essential. 21.65% of the adults in the intervention group and 13.40% of the adults in the control group expressed no difficulty adhering to the sodium restriction in the posttest2. The participants in the intervention group had higher health care behaviours compared to control group, p < 0.001.Conclusion/ImplicationCardiac nurses need to adopt cardiac rehabilitation in continuity of care for improving health care behaviours for adults with chronic heart failure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".