MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193498177 · doi:10.1097/wno.0000000000001394

Junctional Scotoma and Patterns of Visual Field Defects Produced by Lesions Involving the Optic Chiasm

2021· article· en· W3193498177 on OpenAlex
Laura Donaldson, Arshia Eshtiaghi, Simone Sacco, Jonathan A. Micieli, Edward Margolin

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuro-Ophthalmology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOptic chiasmCentral scotomaLesionVisual fieldOphthalmologyOptic nerveNerve fiber layerBlind spotVisual acuityOptic tractSurgeryPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Lesions of the optic chiasm (OC) typically produce bitemporal hemianopia (BTH) on visual field (VF) testing, whereas lesions located at the nasal optic nerve-chiasmal (ON-OC) junction have been proposed to produce junctional scotoma (JXS), a central defect in the ipsilateral eye with temporal field loss in the contralateral eye. In this study, we investigated whether the pattern of VF loss in patients with chiasmal compression predicted the appearance of the causative lesion on neuroimaging and described the clinical presentation of these patients with different types of VF defect. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of patients seen in tertiary neuro-ophthalmology practice over 6 consecutive years with lesions abutting or displacing the OC was performed. Lesion size and location relative to the OC on neuroimaging was determined and correlated with VF defects as well as optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer and macular ganglion cell complex (GCC). RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were enrolled. VFs demonstrated JXS (n = 18), BTH (n = 14), monocular VF defect (n = 4), and no VF defect (n = 17); 64.7% of cases with normal VFs had radiologic OC compression. Lesion volume was highest in the JXS group, and these patients also had the poorest presenting visual acuity. All patients with JXS showed involvement of the ON-OC junction; however, not all cases showed compression of the OC from the nasal direction (15 of 18), and 17 of 18 also showed compression of one or both prechiasmatic ONs. Compression of the ON-OC junction was also seen in 79% of BTH, 100% of monocular VF defect, and 59% of no VF defect cases. Fifty percent of patients with normal VFs already had thinning of the GCC on OCT. GCC thinning was most pronounced nasally in the BTH group, but diffuse bilateral thinning was found in 38% of cases compared with 60% of JXS. VFs improved in 6 of 6 patients with BTH but only in 5 of 8 JXS cases after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: JXS is more often seen with larger lesions and when there is compression of both the prechiasmatic ON and ON-OC junction. These patients have worse presenting visual acuity and poorer outcomes. Not all patients with radiologic compression had VF defects, although 50% of patients with normal VFs had evidence of compression on the macular GCC analysis, emphasizing the importance of macular OCT in the evaluation of patients with lesions involving the OC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.588
Threshold uncertainty score0.408

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it