MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3193544412 · doi:10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.07.002

In-house abbreviated qualification of a real-time polymerase chain reaction method and strategies to amplify mycoplasma detection in human mesenchymal stromal cells

2021· article· en· W3193544412 on OpenAlexaff
Smitha Mathews, R. Rabani, Mozhgan Rasti, Sowmya Viswanathan

Bibliographic record

VenueCytotherapy · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicMicrobial infections and disease research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
FundersRoche DiagnosticsRoche
KeywordsMycoplasmaPolymerase chain reactionReal-time polymerase chain reactionMolecular biologyMesenchymal stem cellBiologyMicrobiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AIMS: In this study, the authors performed an in-house abbreviated qualification of a commercially available real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) kit for limit of detection (LOD), matrix interference and ruggedness of mycoplasma detection in a human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC(M)) investigational cell product (NCT02351011). The approach used was similar to an abbreviated qualification the authors previously conducted for endpoint PCR, which was accepted by Canadian regulators for final product release of the same MSC(M) investigational cell product for treatment of osteoarthritis patients (NCT02351011). With patient consent, biobanked MSCs(M) were re-analyzed by real-time PCR for mycoplasma detection to conduct in-house qualification of the kit. METHODS: LOD was determined by spiking MSCs(M) with a series of 10-fold dilutions of two commercially available genomic DNA (gDNA) reference standards for Mycoplasma arginini (M. arginini) and Mycoplasma hominis (M. hominis). Matrix interference was tested by using 10-fold dilutions of MSC(M)s down to 4500 cells/mL. Polyadenylic acid (poly[A]) was used to improve DNA recovery in samples with 4500-45 000 MSCs(M)/mL. Real-time PCR tests performed on different days were compared to evaluate ruggedness. RESULTS: Real-time PCR analysis showed a conservative LOD of 40 genome copies (GCs)/mL and 240 GCs/mL, which are equivalent to 10 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL, for M. arginini and M. hominis, respectively. According to a less conservative manufacturer-based criterion for positivity, the kit detected 0.4 GC/mL (0.1 CFU/mL) and 24 GCs/mL (1 CFU/mL) M. arginini and M. hominis, respectively. Real-time PCR with different MSC(M) dilutions did not show matrix interference. However, DNA recovery was compromised at MSC(M) concentrations at or below 45 000 cells/mL. The addition of poly(A) as a DNA carrier improved DNA recovery and allowed an LOD, considered here to be equivalent to 10 CFUs/mL, to be achieved, which was not possible in diluted MSC(M) samples (≤45 000 cells/mL) in the absence of poly(A). Ruggedness was demonstrated with tests (n = 18) performed on different days, with an average overall inter-assay percent coefficient of variation of less than 4 for M. arginini (3.62 [400 GCs/mL], 3.61 [40 GCs/mL]) and less than 3 for M. hominis (2.83 [2400 GCs/mL], 1.95 [240 GCs/mL]). CONCLUSIONS: A commercially available real-time PCR mycoplasma detection kit was qualified for evaluating mycoplasma contamination in investigational MSC(M) products and met the criteria used previously (and accepted by Canadian regulators) for in-house qualification of an endpoint PCR mycoplasma detection kit, and the addition of poly(A) addressed the poor recovery of mycoplasma gDNA in samples with low cell numbers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCytotherapySame topicMicrobial infections and disease researchFrench-language works237,207