The impact of timing of concurrent chemoradiation in limited stage SCLC undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Review question / Objective: Does the timing of concurrent chemoradiation in limited stage SCLC undergoing platinumbased chemotherapy affect outcomes.Rationale: Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) occurs in around 15% of all lung cancer cases.1The ratio of cases of limited stage (LS) to extensive stage (ES) is usually described as 1:2, so that only about 5% of all lung cancer cases fall into a LS SCLC.2It is, therefore, not with the great surprise that clinical research is this setting developed slowly with major findings rarely changing pattern of practice worldwide.In t h e p a s t s e v e r a l d e c a d e s , m a n y INPLASY 1 International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols INPLASY PROTOCOL The impact of timing of concurrent chemoradiation in limited stage SCLC undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy Rathod, S 1 ; Liang, Y 2 ; Dubey, A 3 ; Jeremic, B 4 .To cite: Rathod et al.The impact of timing of concurrent chemoradiation in limited stage SCLC undergoing platinum-based chemotherapy.Inplasy protocol 202180049.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".