Analysis of ternary AlGaX <sub>2</sub> (X = As, Sb) compounds for opto-electronic and renewable energy devices using density functional theory
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Based on the First-principles calculations, we have investigated the opto-electronic properties of AlGaX 2 (X = As, Sb). We find that the AlGaX 2 (X = As, Sb) is energetically stable due to lower formation enthalpy. Additionally, the dynamical stability is also confirmed by phonon calculation and found no-imaginary frequencies in the phonon-spectra. Interestingly, both AlGaAs 2 and AlGaSb 2 compounds possesses semiconductor nature with a direct bandgap of 1.40 eV and 0.70 eV, respectively. For the technological applications of AlGaX 2 (X = As, Sb), we have analyzed optical properties in terms of absorption of photon energy and polarization. A strong absorption peaks are observed in the visible region. Moreover, the thermoelectric properties are calculated in terms of electrical/thermal conductivities, Seebeck coefficient, and figure of merit (ZT). Thermal parameters are critical for determining a material’ thermal stability across the wide range of temperatures. We expect that our calculated properties of AlGaAs 2 and AlGaSb 2 compounds could pave a new route for the applications in the optoelectronics and thermoelectric devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".