Serum ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ratio and diabetic retinopathy: A propensity score matching based case-control study in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Optimal ω-6/ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids ratio (PUFAR) is reported to exert protective effects against chronic diseases. However, data on PUFAR and diabetic retinopathy (DR) remains scarce. We aimed to thoroughly quantify whether and how PUFAR was related to DR as well as its role in DR detection. METHODS: This two-centre case-control study was conducted from August 2017 to June 2018 in China, participants were matched using a propensity score matching algorithm. We adopted multivariable logistic regression models and restricted cubic spline analyses to estimate the independent association of PUFAR with DR, adjusting for confounders identified using a directed acyclic graph. The value of PUFAR as a biomarker for DR identification was further evaluated by receiver operating characteristic analyses and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests. FINDINGS: An apparent negative relationship between PUFAR and DR was observed. Adjusted odds of DR decreased by 79% (OR: 0·21, 95% CI: 0·10-0·40) with an interquartile range increase in PUFAR. Similar results were also obtained in tertile analysis. As compared to those in the 1st tertile of PUFAR, the adjusted odds of DR decreased by 76% (OR: 0·24, 95% CI: 0·08-0·66) and 93% (OR: 0·07, 95% CI: 0·03-0·22) for subjects in the 2nd and 3rd tertiles, respectively. Good calibration and discrimination of the PUFAR associated predictive model were detected and PUFAR = 35 would be an ideal cut-off value for DR identification. INTERPRETATION: Our results suggest that serum PUAFR is inversely associated with DR. Although PUFAR-alteration is not observed amongst different stages of DR, it can serve as an ideal biomarker in distinguishing patients with DR from those without DR. FUNDING: This study was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province, Zhejiang Basic Public Welfare Research Project, the Major Project of the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, and the Academician's Science and Technology Innovation Program in Zhejiang province. Part of this work was also funded by the National Nature Science Foundation of China, and Research Project for College Students in Wenzhou Medical University.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".