Physicochemical properties of the dissolved organic carbon can lead to different physiological responses of zebrafish (<i>Danio rerio</i>) under neutral and acidic conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Previous studies have suggested that the capacity of natural dissolved organic carbon (DOC) molecules to interact with biological membranes is associated with their aromaticity (SAC 340 ); origin (allochthonous versus autochthonous, FI); molecular weight (Abs 254/365 ); and relative fluorescence of DOC moieties (PARAFAC analysis). These interactions may be especially important when fish are challenged by acidic waters, which are known to inhibit the active uptake of Na + and Cl ‐ , while stimulating diffusive ion losses in freshwater fishes. Therefore, zebrafish were acclimated (7 days, pH 7.0) to five natural DOC sources (10 mg C/L), two from the Amazon Basin and three from Canada, together with a “no‐added DOC” control. After the acclimation, fish were challenged by exposure to acidic water (pH 4.0) for 3 h. Osmoregulatory parameters were measured at pH 7.0 and 4.0. Acclimation to the five DOC sources did not disturb Na + , Cl ‐ and ammonia net fluxes, but resulted in differential elevations in Na + , K + ATPase and v‐type H + ATPase activities in fish at pH 7.0. However, after transfer to pH.4.0, the control fish exhibited rapid increases in both enzymes. In contrast the DOC‐ acclimated animals exhibited unchanged (Na + , K + ATPase) or differentially increased (v‐type H + ATPase) activities. Na + , Cl ‐ and ammonia net fluxes remained unchanged in the control fish, but were differentially elevated in most of the DOC treatments at pH 4.0, relative to the same DOC treatments at pH 7.0. Correlations between the osmoregulatory data the DOCs properties highlight that the DOC properties drive different effects on gill physiology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".