Bibliographic record
Abstract
The legal bases of strategic planning in the United States, Canada, France, the Republic of Poland and Japan are analyzed. It is established that within the national legal systems of the studied countries there is no single unified approach to the organization of the strategic planning process. The peculiarities of strategic planning are studied and its main tasks in foreign countries are singled out. It was found that in most foreign countries there is a three-tier system of territorial socio-economic development. The importance of strategic planning in the United States of America lies in outlining the main priorities for economic development at the federal level and to organize on this basis partnerships with state authorities, businesses and directly citizens. In Canada, the strategic planning system includes an interconnected system of documents that reflect different levels of public administration: a federal strategy for sustainable development, which outlines the prospects and priorities for state development; sustainable development strategies of regions (states), developed on the basis of national strategy and national development programs; strategies for sustainable development of cities that best express the interests of the population; development strategies of certain sectors of the economy and line ministries, government agencies, agencies. It is established that the regional component in the formation and implementation of economic development strategy is considered in France, as in most European countries, as a constant phenomenon with an emphasis on restructuring regions, maximizing their domestic development potential, supporting small and medium businesses. The state policy of the Republic of Poland is carried out on the basis of normatively established development strategies: long-term, medium-term development strategies of the country and other development strategies of regions, territories, sectors or industries, which are implemented through programs. The main purpose of strategies in Japan is to establish government policy goals, guide agencies and non-governmental actors to set targets for the processes and trends being monitored, and engage in dialogue with society to adjust government assessments and goals. Attention is drawn to the need to implement positive international practice in order to ensure the quality of the strategic planning process in Ukraine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".