Rogue waves in the KdV-type models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we investigate the rogue-wave-type phenomena in the physical systems described by the Korteweg-de Vries (KdV)-like equation in the form $ u_t + [u^m \sgn{u}]_x + u_{xxx} = 0 $ with the arbitrary real coefficient $m>0$. The periodic waves (sinusoidal or cnoidal) described by this equation have been shown to suffer from the modulational instability if $m \ge 3$; the modulational growth results in the formation of rogue waves similar to the Peregrine, Kuznetsov-Ma or Akhmediev breathers known for the nonlinear Schrodinger equation. In this work we focus on the rogue wave occurrence in ensembles of soliton-type waves. First of all, the characteristics of the solitary waves are investigated depending on the power $m$. The existence of solitary waves with exponential tails, as well as algebraic solitons and compactons has been shown for different ranges of the parameter $m$ values. Their energetic stability is discussed. Two solitary wave/breathers interactions are studied as elementary acts of the soliton/breather turbulence. It is demonstrated that the property of attracting solitons/breathers is a necessity condition for the formation of rogue waves. Rigorous results are obtained for the integrable versions of the KdV-type equations. Series of numerical simulations of the rogue wave generation has been conducted for different values of $m$. The obtained results are applied to the problems of surface and internal waves in the ocean, and to elastic waves in the solid medium. The research is supported by the RNF grant 19-12-00253.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".