MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194220760 · doi:10.14288/1.0401455

Some research problems under finite mixture models

2021· article· en· W3194220760 on OpenAlexaff
Ho Yin Ho

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This thesis studies two types of research problems under finite mixture models. The first type is mixing distribution estimation. It is well-known that the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) fails under some finite mixture models because their likelihood function is unbounded. This unboundedness occurs, for instance, under the finite normal mixture model, the finite gamma mixture model, and the finite location-scale mixture model. In the literature, different estimation methods have been developed by modifying the likelihood functions to restore consistency. The penalized MLE is one of the popular remedies. Though the consistency of penalized MLE has been studied extensively by many researchers, the results were often acquired under finite mixture models with some specific forms of kernel distribution. We provide a route to establish the consistency of penalized MLE under a unified framework that covers many finite mixture models. This route summarizes and helps to improve the existing results. We also study a novel way to modify the likelihood function based on data augmentation. This modified likelihood function produces a consistent estimator, the augmented MLE, under those finite mixture models with unbounded likelihood functions. In some circumstances, the augmented MLE is more efficient than its competitors in the literature. The second type of research problem is hypothesis testing for homogeneity un- der finite mixture models. We develop two tests for this purpose. First, our work migrates the Expectation-Maximization (EM) test to a finite vector-parameter mixture model with structural parameters. The EM test is a numeric and analytically tractable likelihood-based test, which has been applied to many finite mixture models. The second test is Neyman’s C(α) test, a score test variant. We generalize this test to finite vector-parameter mixture models following the principles of Neyman. Our generalization aligns with some existing results in the literature, though they are motivated differently. Yet we find this generalized test can be asymptotically biased under the finite gamma mixture model. To overcome this deficiency, we develop another C(α) test that we conjecture to be asymptotically unbiased.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.969
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicBayesian Methods and Mixture ModelsFrench-language works237,207