MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194379528 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2460

Cepheid metallicity in the Leavitt law (C-metall) survey – I. HARPS-N@TNG spectroscopy of 47 classical Cepheids and 1 BL Her variables

2021· article· en· W3194379528 on OpenAlexfundno aff
V. Ripepi, G. Catanzaro, R. Molinaro, M. Gatto, M. Marconi, M. Romaniello, S. Leccia, I. Musella, E. Trentin, G. Clementini, V. Testa, F. Cusano, J. Storm

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIstituto Nazionale di AstrofisicaAgenzia Spaziale ItalianaInstitut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments FonctionnelsMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
KeywordsCepheid variablePhysicsMetallicityAstrophysicsSpectroscopyAstronomyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Classical Cepheids (DCEPs) are the most important primary indicators of the extragalactic distance scale. Establishing the dependence on metallicity of their period–luminosity and period–Wesenheit (PLZ/PWZ) relations has deep consequences on the calibration of secondary distance indicators that lead to the final estimate of the Hubble constant (H0). We collected high-resolution spectroscopy for 47 DCEPs plus 1 BL Her variables with HARPS-N@TNG and derived accurate atmospheric parameters, radial velocities, and metal abundances. We measured spectral lines for 29 species and characterized their chemical abundances, finding very good agreement with previous results. We re-determined the ephemerides for the program stars and measured their intensity-averaged magnitudes in the V, I, J, H, Ks bands. We complemented our sample with literature data and used the Gaia Early Data Release 3 (EDR3) to investigate the PLZ/PWZ relations for Galactic DCEPs in a variety of filter combinations. We find that the solution without any metallicity term is ruled out at more than the 5σ level. Our best estimate for the metallicity dependence of the intercept of the PLKs, PWJKs, PWVKs, and PWHVI relations with three parameters is −0.456 ± 0.099, −0.465 ± 0.071, −0.459 ± 0.107, and −0.366 ± 0.089 mag dex−1, respectively. These values are significantly larger than the recent literature. The present data are still inconclusive to establish whether or not also the slope of the relevant relationships depends on metallicity. Applying a correction to the standard zero-point offset of the Gaia parallaxes has the same effect of reducing by ∼22 per cent the size of the metallicity dependence on the intercept of the PLZ/PWZ relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.414
Threshold uncertainty score0.991

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207