MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194421736 · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2020.509

Paradigmas de gestão educacional no contexto do Prêmio Gestão Escolar

2020· dissertation· pt· W3194421736 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lilian Gonçalves

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Political Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Political scienceMedicineInternal medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is part of the research line State Policies and Management of Education, of Programa de Pós-graduação em Educação from Faculdade de Educação of Universidade Federal de Uberlândia (PPGED/FACED/UFU). In the current Brazilian context, in which management principles are inserted in public policies, this master’s dissertation deals with the educational and school management paradigms in the Prêmio Gestão Escolar (PGE). This management award policy is a recognition of Conselho Nacional de Secretários de Educação (CONSED), in relation to schools that present management practices considered effective. The problem that guided the investigation is based on the following question: what management model is described in the PGE and to what extent does the logic of this award lead to a managerial administration? Therefore, the general objective is to analyze the PGE to understand the management model outlined in its documents and prescriptive mechanisms of management in a managerial logic of awards. The specific objectives are: to understand the configuration assumed by the school administration throughout the history of education; to analyze the public management model in the State Reform processes since the 20th century and its effects in the field of educational management; and to analyze conceptions, principles and contradictions present in the PGE. To subsidize the study, we rely on important authors in the field of educational management, both in international level, such as Apple (2005), Ball (2011), Barroso (1996), Dardot and Laval (2011), Havey (2014) and Laval (2019), and in Brazil, like Lima, Shimamoto and Prado (2011), Paro (2012), Pereira (2001), Rosar (2013), Sander (2007), Shiroma (2000), Veiga (1995), among others. The methodological option is based on the qualitative approach, whose data were obtained through documentary research, and we used Content Analysis (CA) as a technique for data treatment and production of inferences. We understand that the PGE, implemented in Brazilian public schools since 1998, has characteristics and contradictions that reveal the principles that defined the new conduct of the State in public policies from the 1990s to the present day and that were guided by neoliberal reforms. Discrepancies are observed in the interface between managerialism and democratic administration, since democratic and managerial principles can be verified in the quality indicators. In this research, we recognized that the PGE and other educational policies and programs are guiding and prescriptive tools for an effective management model to be adopted in public schools which apply to the PGE and that, from a democratic discourse and encouraging collective participation, brings new meanings to autonomy, participation and democratic management. We consider that autonomy assumes the sense of responsibility for the success or failure of educational policies, such as those of external assessment, whose participation sometimes reserves to the school users the position of external evaluators of na acquired service, which makes it possible to benchmark the education institutions. In this sense, the administration appropriates terms supported in democratic management, but it puts its own brand in a context in which neoliberalism has regulated educational policy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.081
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSocial and Political IssuesFrench-language works237,207