Rapid and Mild One‐Flow Synthetic Approach to Unsymmetrical Sulfamides Guided by Bayesian Optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Bayesian optimization (BO) is regarded as an efficient approach that can identify optimal conditions using a restricted number of experiments. Despite demonstrated potential of BO, applications of BO‐based approaches in synthetic organic chemistry remain limited. Herein, we achieved the first rapid and mild (5.1 s, 20 °C) one‐flow synthesis of unsymmetrical sulfamides from inexpensive sulfuryl chloride. Undesired reactions were successfully suppressed and the risk in handling sulfuryl chloride was minimized by the use of micro‐flow technology. The reaction conditions producing ≥75 % yield were identified by a machine learning approach based on BO. It was demonstrated that BO produced the desired reaction conditions with a small number of experiments (19 and 10 experiments) in the entire search space (10,500 combinations of reaction conditions). Gaussian process (GP) models produced by BO provided the relationships between combinations of reaction parameters and outputs (RCRPO).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".