MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deposition or diagenesis? Probing the Ediacaran Shuram excursion in South China by SIMS

2021· article· en· W3194461282 on OpenAlexafffund
Huan Cui, Kouki Kitajima, Ian J. Orland, Shuhai Xiao, Jean‐Marc Baele, Alan J. Kaufman, Adam Denny, Chuanming Zhou, Michael J. Spicuzza, John Fournelle, John W. Valley

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal and Planetary Change · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersUniversité de ParisNuclear Safety and Security CommissionCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchNASA Astrobiology InstituteNational Aeronautics and Space AdministrationU.S. Department of EnergyUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Nevada, Las VegasNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPetrographySedimentary depositional environmentDiagenesisGeologyGeochemistryCalciteLithificationDolomitizationMineralogyPaleontologyFacies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Ediacaran Period (ca. 635–541 Ma) witnessed the earliest paleontological evidence for macroscopic animals (i.e., Ediacara biota) and geochemical observations of the largest carbon cycle anomaly in Earth history (i.e., Shuram Excursion, SE). Numerous hypotheses have been proposed for the origins of the SE, ranging from primary seawater anomaly to syn- or post-depositional diagenesis . Despite intensive geochemical and theoretical work published in the past decade, empirical evidence that is strictly based on fundamental petrographic results at the micrometer scale is still limited. To evaluate depositional compositions and diagenetic effects on samples from the SE, we investigated the EN3 interval in the Doushantuo Formation of South China via integrated cathodoluminescence (CL), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), and scanning electron microscope (SEM). Detailed petrographic observations reveal that the EN3 limestone is dominated by calcite microspar, with minor but variable amounts of disseminated zoned dolomite crystals. The former likely formed via neomorphism of depositional micrite , while the latter was the result of progressive post-depositional dolomitization . The mean values of paired SIMS δ 13 C calcite and δ 13 C dolomite compositions are indistinguishable in each sample and consistent with published micro-drilled bulk-powder δ 13 C values, which we interpret to represent depositional “background” signals of seawater dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). We also observed μm-scale variability of SIMS δ 13 C data that may reflect a variable diagenetic overprint after deposition. Our integrated petrographic and geochemical results are consistent with a depositional origin of the SE and provide little evidence for the hypothesized isotope alteration by meteoric and mixing-zone diagenesis or late burial diagenesis . In light of this study, we propose that the SE indeed represents a marine carbon cycle anomaly that bears a close temporal link to the Ediacaran surface environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueGlobal and Planetary ChangeSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207