MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194732169 · doi:10.11159/icepr21.111

Renewable Eco-Friendly Activated Biochar from Tobacco: ChlorpyrifosRemoval Studies

2021· article· en· W3194732169 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Élio Conradi, Affonso Celso Gonçalves, Juliano Zimmermann, Daniel Schwantes, Carlos Daniel Zenni, Guilherme Lindner Ziemer, Vinícius Henrique Dias de Oliveira, Felipe Dudczak

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
KeywordsBiocharEnvironmentally friendlyChlorpyrifosEnvironmental scienceWaste managementRenewable energyActivated carbonPulp and paper industryChemistryPesticidePyrolysisAgronomyEngineeringOrganic chemistryBiologyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We evaluated the potential application of tobacco as a low-cost raw matter for the development of a new and ecological activated biochar, with the aim of chlorpyrifos adsorption. This was performed by means of characterization and testing the efficiency of the activated biochar based on tobacco from seized cigarettes. Chemically and thermally activated biochar were produced with diferent chemical modifying agents (ZnCl2 and NaOH). The treatments improved the features of adsorbent structure, with an increas of 1775x in SSA of AB-ZnCl2. The adsorption of chlorpyrifos by the activated biochar seems to occur partially by chemical and partially by physical interactions between the pesticide and the surface functional groups O-H, C-H, C=O, C-C, C-H, C-O. The good adjustments may indicate the adsorption of mono and multilayer. The materials show great results for removal of chlorpyrifos with an estimate qm of 683.30 and 1602.40 g g -1 for Langmuir, respectively found for AB and to AB-ZnCl2. This way, the production of activated biochar can be an excellent alternative for the destination and use of tobacco deriving by seized cigarettes, allowing its use in remediation and decontamination of water.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.733

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicAdsorption and biosorption for pollutant removalFrench-language works237,207