Retinitis Punctata Albescens and RLBP1-Allied Phenotypes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To identify relevant criteria for gene therapy based on clinical and genetic characteristics of rod–cone dystrophy associated with RLBP1 pathogenic variants in a large cohort comprising children and adults. Design Retrospective cohort study. Participants Patients with pathogenic variants in RLBP1 registered in a single French reference center specialized in inherited retinal dystrophies. Methods Clinical, multimodal imaging, and genetic findings were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures Age of onset; visual acuity; ellipsoid line length; nasal, temporal, and foveal retinal thickness; and pathogenic variants and related phenotypes, including Newfoundland rod–cone and Bothnia dystrophies (NFRCDs), were reappraised. Results Twenty-one patients (15 families) were included. The most frequent form was NFRCD with 12 patients (8 families) homozygous for the recurrent deletion of exons 7 through 9 in RLBP1 and 5 patients (4 families) with biallelic protein-truncating variants (2 novel: p.Gln16∗ and p.Tyr251∗). A novel combination of the p.Arg234Trp Bothnia variant with a nonsense variant in trans led to Bothnia dystrophy in 2 sisters. One proband carrying the p.Met266Lys Bothnia variant and in trans p.Arg121Trp and a second, with the p.Arg9Cys and p.Tyr111∗ combination, both demonstrated mild retinitis punctata albescens. Independently of genotype, all patients showed a visual acuity of worse than 20/200, an ellipsoid line width of less than 1000 μm, and a mean foveal thickness of less than 130 to 150 μm, with loss of both the interdigitation and ellipsoid lines. Conclusions The eligibility for RLBP1 gene therapy first should be determined according to the biallelic variant combination using a robust classification as proposed herein. An ellipsoid line width of more than 1200 μm and a central thickness of more than 130 to 150 μm with detectable ellipsoid and interdigitation lines should be 2 prerequisite imaging indicators for gene therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".