Retinitis Punctata Albescens and RLBP1-Allied Phenotypes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: pathogenic variants in a large cohort comprising children and adults. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Participants: registered in a single French reference center specialized in inherited retinal dystrophies. Methods: Clinical, multimodal imaging, and genetic findings were reviewed. Main Outcome Measures: Age of onset; visual acuity; ellipsoid line length; nasal, temporal, and foveal retinal thickness; and pathogenic variants and related phenotypes, including Newfoundland rod-cone and Bothnia dystrophies (NFRCDs), were reappraised. Results: p.Arg121Trp and a second, with the p.Arg9Cys and p.Tyr111∗ combination, both demonstrated mild retinitis punctata albescens. Independently of genotype, all patients showed a visual acuity of worse than 20/200, an ellipsoid line width of less than 1000 μm, and a mean foveal thickness of less than 130 to 150 μm, with loss of both the interdigitation and ellipsoid lines. Conclusions: gene therapy first should be determined according to the biallelic variant combination using a robust classification as proposed herein. An ellipsoid line width of more than 1200 μm and a central thickness of more than 130 to 150 μm with detectable ellipsoid and interdigitation lines should be 2 prerequisite imaging indicators for gene therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it