MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3194798307 · doi:10.1289/isee.2021.p-324

Effects of indoor and outdoor temperatures on blood pressure and central hemodynamics in a wintertime panel of peri-urban Chinese adults

2021· article· en· W3194798307 on OpenAlexaff
Talia Joss Sternbach, Xiaoying Li, Xiang Zhang, Ellison Carter, Guofeng Shen, Shu Tao, Yuanxun Zhang, Jill Baumgartner, Sam Harper

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate Change and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureEnvironmental scienceMedicineHemodynamicsDiastolePulse pressureLinear regressionAtmospheric sciencesCardiologyInternal medicineStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Excess wintertime cardiovascular mortality has been observed in populations globally and is partly attributed to cold-induced elevated blood pressure (BP). An inverse relationship between outdoor temperature and BP is well documented. The influence of indoor environmental conditions (e.g., heating, insulation) and indoor temperature on BP is less clear. We examined the effects of indoor and outdoor temperature on wintertime BP and central hemodynamics among older adults in peri-urban Beijing, China. METHODS: We enrolled 1,285 older adults into a panel study conducted in two winter seasons (2018-19 and 2019-2020). Staff traveled to participant homes to administer a questionnaire and measure their brachial and central systolic and diastolic BPs, pulse pressures, and pulse pressure amplification. Indoor temperature was measured within the 5-minutes prior to BP measurements for all participants and 12-month indoor temperature measurements were obtained in a 37% (1st season) and 32% (2nd season) random subsample. Village-level outdoor temperature was estimated from regional meteorological stations. Multivariable mixed-effects regression models were used to estimate the within- and between-individual effects of indoor and outdoor temperature on BP, allowing for effect measure modification. RESULTS:Indoor and outdoor winter temperatures ranged from 0.0 to 28.0˚C and -14.3 to 6.4˚C, respectively. Those in colder homes had a lower wealth score and less home insulation. We observed an inverse linear relationship between indoor temperature and BP (mmHg per 1˚C increase in temperature: −0.4 to −0.5 systolic, −0.3 diastolic, and −0.2 pulse pressure). We found little evidence of any effect of outdoor temperature with BP, or that outdoor temperature modified the effect of indoor temperature. CONCLUSIONS:We found an inverse association between indoor temperature and BP, but no relationship of BP with outdoor temperature. This suggests a stronger effect on BP of indoor compared to outdoor temperature. Improving insulation and household heating may help lower BP and prevent excess winter mortality. KEYWORDS: Cardiovascular diseases, Epidemiology, Socio-economic factors, Temperature

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.615

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicClimate Change and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207