MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195035270

National Innovation: Mobilizing Nations for the 21st Century Economy

2007· article· en· W3195035270 on OpenAlexaff
Carin Holroyd, Ken Coates

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan Books · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Development and Aid
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooAsia Pacific Foundation of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaWorld economyInternational tradeBusinessEconomyPolitical scienceEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rarely have international economic fundamentals undergone such rapid and dramatic transformation, In a period of little more than two decades, China emerged from Communist isolation to become one of the most dynamic economies in the world- With the World Trade Organization establishing itself as one of the most important international associations, freer trade and the development of a globally integrated economy became the key development of the last years of the 20th century. Outsourcing emerged as one of the most important commercial processes of a generation, as manufacturers relocated factory operations to low-cost countries, particularly China, and in one of the most unexpected shifts in many generations, service companies capitalized on liberalized laws and communications technologies to move thousands of white-collar Jobs from industrial nations to emerging economies. Casting a pall over the otherwise remarkable and positive international changes were the unrelenting poverty of sub-Saharan Africa and large portions of Central and South America, religiously based conflicts that destabilized the Middle East and launched an era of global terrorism, the depressing decay of Russia, looming international oil and gas shortages and skyrocketing prices, falling birth rates in the industrial world and ominous environmental dangers associated with global warming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan BooksSame topicInternational Development and AidFrench-language works237,207