MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195080911 · doi:10.1002/adma.202103394

Passivation of the Buried Interface via Preferential Crystallization of 2D Perovskite on Metal Oxide Transport Layers

2021· article· en· W3195080911 on OpenAlexaff
Bin Chen, Hao Chen, Yi Hou, Jian Xu, Sam Teale, Koen Bertens, Haijie Chen, Andrew H. Proppe, Qi‐Lin Zhou, Danni Yu, Kaimin Xu, Maral Vafaie, Yuan Liu, Yitong Dong, Eui Hyuk Jung, Chao Zheng, Tong Zhu, Zhijun Ning, Edward H. Sargent

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Materials · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPerovskite Materials and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersOffice of Naval ResearchU.S. Navy
KeywordsPassivationPerovskite (structure)Materials scienceCrystallizationEnergy conversion efficiencySubstrate (aquarium)OxidePhotoluminescenceCarrier lifetimeLayer (electronics)MetalOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringNanotechnologySiliconMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The open‐circuit voltage ( V oc ) of perovskite solar cells is limited by non‐radiative recombination at perovskite/carrier transport layer (CTL) interfaces. 2D perovskite post‐treatments offer a means to passivate the top interface; whereas, accessing and passivating the buried interface underneath the perovskite film requires new material synthesis strategies. It is posited that perovskite ink containing species that bind strongly to substrates can spontaneously form a passivating layer with the bottom CTL. The concept using organic spacer cations with rich NH 2 groups is implemented, where readily available hydrogens have large binding affinity to under‐coordinated oxygens on the metal oxide substrate surface, inducing preferential crystallization of a thin 2D layer at the buried interface. The passivation effect of this 2D layer is examined using steady‐state and time‐resolved photoluminescence spectroscopy: the 2D interlayer suppresses non‐radiative recombination at the buried perovskite/CTL interface, leading to a 72% reduction in surface recombination velocity. This strategy enables a 65 mV increase in V oc for NiO x based p–i–n devices, and a 100 mV increase in V oc for SnO 2 ‐based n–i–p devices. Inverted solar cells with 20.1% power conversion efficiency (PCE) for 1.70 eV and 22.9% PCE for 1.55 eV bandgap perovskites are demonstrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations161
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced MaterialsSame topicPerovskite Materials and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207