A High-Efficiency 27–30-GHz 130-nm Bi-CMOS Transmitter Front End for SATCOM Phased Arrays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A high-efficiency 27–30 GHz 0.13-${{\mu } \text {m}}$BiCMOS transmitter front end for mobile satellite communication (SATCOM) phased arrays is presented. A system-level analysis for determining the key parameters of the RF front end for the case of a SATCOM user terminal for geostationary Earth orbit (GEO) is presented. The building blocks of the beamformer, consisting of a phase shifter, variable attenuator, and power amplifier, are fully characterized. A 360° phase shifter with an accuracy of 7 bits and amplitude error of ±1.5 dB is integrated with a variable attenuator that provides a gain variation of 16 dB with phase error of ±5°. The chip has a measured transducer gain of 23 dB and a power consumption of 45 mW at OP1dBof 10.8 dBm. The power-added efficiency (PAE) of 26.7% is measured for the entire channel at OP1dB. An error vector magnitude (EVM) of −28 dB at Pout,avgof 6 dBm and PAEavgof 12% is measured for a 400-MHz bandwidth 64-QAM modulated signal. The overall size of the chip is${1.18} \times {2.23}\,\,\text {mm}^{{2}}$.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".