“At least we’re in Canada”: A critical perspective applying Du Bois and Simmel to Black African students' identity experiences in Canadian universities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using concepts from theorists W.E.B Du Bois and Georg Simmel, I examine the sociological dimensions to the identity experiences of Black African students as temporary international or permanent immigrants attending universities in Canada. In what ways do social structures in the host country of Canada inhibit positive experiences of Black African students in Canadian universities? Du Bois’ concepts of ‘double consciousness’ and the metaphor of ‘the veil’ highlight the difficulty that Black folks in America experience as they live their identities against and through the eyes of white supremacy. This concept is extended to the experience of Black African students in Canada where Black people are a visible minority and experience racism (Creese, 2020). Further, Simmel’s concept of the ‘blasé attitude’, also referred simply as blasé, is about the sense of indifference personified by individuals living in metropolises due to overstimulation and an overly commodified lifestyle in the city environment. The blasé is applicable to understanding the experience of Black African students in Canadian universities, which are often in metropolitan cities. Although Black African students, especially those who are international, are largely optimistic as they venture into Canadian universities, using the concepts of double consciousness, the veil and the blasé attitude, a socio-cultural reality is revealed that counters the positive image that Canadian universities themselves portray. In this reality, Black African students encounter particular challenges connected to their perceived or self-proclaimed Black African identities, which serve as an impediment to their wellbeing, academic growth and career advancement. Using a critical race theory framework, Du Bois’ concept of double consciousness and the veil, and Simmel’s concept of blasé are used to examine how systems and practices of racism, neo-racism, and attitudes of complacency infringe on Black African students having more holistically positive experiences while studying at Canadian universities, despite the fact that many well-known universities are located in ‘diverse’ or ‘multicultural’ cities in Canada. These concepts are applied to show how certain sociological factors, that is, systems, processes, practices and actions that are already in place, work against Black African identities and function against these students once they enter these settings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.107 | 0.067 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.012 |
| Research integrity | 0.008 | 0.019 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".