Design, Synthesis, and Cytotoxicity Assessment of [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-Terpyridine Platinum Conjugate: A Novel Chemoradiotherapeutic Agent with Flexible Linker
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Maximum benefits of chemoradiation therapy with platinum-based compounds are expected if the radiation and the drug are localized simultaneously in cancer cells. To optimize this concomitant effect, we developed the novel chemoradiotherapeutic agent [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP by conjugating, via a short flexible alkyl chain spacer (C3), a terpyridine platinum (TP) moiety to a NOTA chelator complexed with copper-64 (64Cu). The decay of 64Cu produces numerous low-energy electrons, enabling the 64Cu-conjugate to deliver radiation energy close to TP, which intercalates into G-quadruplex DNA. Accordingly, the in vitro internalization kinetic and the cytotoxic activity of [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP and its derivatives were investigated with colorectal cancer (HCT116) and normal human fibroblast (GM05757) cells. Radiolabeling by 64Cu results in a >55,000-fold increase of cytotoxic potential relative to [NatCu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP at 72 h post administration, indicating a large additive effect between 64Cu and the TP drug. The internalization and nucleus accumulation of [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP in the HCT116 cells were, respectively, 3.1 and 6.0 times higher than that for GM05757 normal human fibroblasts, which is supportive of the higher efficiency of the [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP for HCT116 cancer cells. This work presents the first proof-of-concept study showing the potential use of the [64Cu]Cu-NOTA-C3-TP conjugate as a targeted chemoradiotherapeutic agent to treat colorectal cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".