MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195439375

Trust and Confidence in a Secure Internet: A Public Good?

2018· article· en· W3195439375 on OpenAlexaff
Prabir K. Neogi, Arthur J. Cordell, Donald MacLean

Bibliographic record

VenueSSRN Electronic Journal · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAccess Control and Trust
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThe InternetInternet privacyBusinessMalwareMobile phoneHackerCyberspaceComputer securityCybercrimeWorld Wide WebComputer scienceTelecommunications
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today we have near-universal availability of the Internet, with some 3.6 billion users in 200 countries worldwide. Simultaneously the intelligent mobile phone, with over 7 billion subscriptions globally, has become the most widely used communications device in the world, the access device of choice in developing countries and is often the only available device there for accessing the Internet and its associated services. In this paper the authors will show that the building of an appropriate institutional and legal infrastructure for the global digital marketplace and its underlying Internet infrastructure, as well as the creation of commonly accepted, understandable and internationally enforceable marketplace rules which provide trust and confidence for all those who operate in that marketplace or are affected by it, is a necessary condition for the efficient functioning of a global, digital economy. Although the Internet has transformed our economy and society, it was never designed and built for global, ubiquitous and secure commercial use. For the Internet to reach its full potential as a trusted global platform for commercial use, it must retain the trust and confidence of its users.Thus the creation of such Trust and Confidence in the Internet may be seen as analogous to creating a public good. The positive socio-economic benefits derived from the Internet and the World Wide Web are enormous and have largely been appropriated. However, the negative developments (e.g. malware, hacking, identity theft, the dark web and organized cyber-fraud and cyber-crime) are increasing in magnitude and cost.They need to be studied more carefully and the trade-offs with the benefits understood better, so that practical and workable remedial measures can be proposed, both nationally and globally. This paper makes the case that the status quo is untenable in the medium term. The increasing quantitative load put on the Internet by billions of vulnerable new users (e.g. mobile users) and new uses (e.g. the Internet of Things), combined with increasing net threats, will eventually degrade the public Internet unless new institutional and governance arrangements can be created. The task of building an environment of trust and confidence in the digital economy is complex: there is no magic or silver bullet. It will require a multi-stakeholder global approach and will involve concerted actions among many stakeholders: to create the requisite legal and regulatory environment; to develop voluntary codes of practice; to educate businesses, consumers and public service providers; and to create tools that are easy to use. Drawing upon the lessons of history and historical analogies, as well as examining some ideas proposed in various fora such as the OECD, ITU, IGF, GCIG and by various experts, we shall explore some scenarios to strengthen the Internet that could lead to more security for all users, and review what sorts of “rules of the road” will be necessary to achieve that outcome.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.867

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSSRN Electronic JournalSame topicAccess Control and TrustFrench-language works237,207