Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article denounces the crisis that present-day technological civilization has in its relation with the land, usually considered an object to exploit and conquer; the author advocates the need to develop a 'poetics of place' inspired by the respectful relationship that other civilizations have been able to establish with their land. The analysis of Judith Wright's literary work shows the complexity of an Australian view that explores the link between Aboriginal people and the land, and the way in which white settlement interrupted it. Bibliography Brady V. 1998. South Of My Days: A Biography Of Judith Wright . Sydney: Angus & Robertson. Brissenden R. F. 1968. “The Poetry of Judith Wright”, in Thompson A.V. Critical Essays On Judith Wright . Brisbane: Jacaranda Press: 42. Carter P. 1987. The Road To Botany Bay: An Essay In Spatial History . London: Faber & Faber. Eliade M. 1974. The Myth Of The Eternal Return: Or, Cosmos And History . Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hand S. (ed). 1993. “Ethics As First Philosophy”, in The Levinas Reader . Oxford: Blackwell: 85. Harris L. 1998. Divine Action: An Interview With John Polkinghorne . Cross Currents 48/1: 3-14. Heidegger M. 1975. “Building Dwelling Thinking”, in Poetry, Language, Thought . New York: Harper Colophon Books: 157. Keeffe K. 2003. Paddy’s Road: Life Stories Of Patrick Dodson . Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press. Kristeva J. 2001. Hannah Arendt: Life Is A Narrative . Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Ley J. 2006. “How Small The Lights Of Home”: Andrew Mc Gahan And The Politics Of Guilt.’ Australian Book Review : 280. Ricoeur P. 1969. The Symbolism Of Evil . Boston: Beacon Press. Studer J. Consciousness And Reality: Our Entry Into Creation . Cross Currents 48/ 1: 15-33. Wright J. 1965. Generations Of Men . Melbourne: Oxford University Press. Wright J. 1994. Collected Poems: 1942-1985 . Sydney: Angus & Robertson. Wright J. 1992. Going On Talking . Sydney: Butterfly Books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.011 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".