MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195594638 · doi:10.1002/lim2.46

Median duration and factors that influence the duration of symptom resolution in COVID‐19 patients in Ethiopia: A follow‐up study involving symptomatic cases

2021· article· en· W3195594638 on OpenAlexaff
Saro Abdella Abrahim, Masresha Tessema, Eshetu Ejeta, Mahammed Ahmed, Atkure Defar, Alemayehu Hussen, Getachew Demoz, Eskindir Degu, Mulugeta Aseratie, Belay Merga, Enatenesh Dillnessa, Tegene Regassa, Dereje Duguma, Susan J. Whiting

Bibliographic record

VenueLifestyle Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHazard ratioProportional hazards modelCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Body mass indexCohortInternal medicineCohort studyConfidence intervalPediatricsDisease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Understanding the clinical features of COVID‐19 and duration for resolution of symptoms is crucial for isolation of patients and tailoring public health messaging, interventions and policy. Therefore, this study aims to assess the median duration of COVID‐19 signs and symptoms’ resolution and explore its predictors among symptomatic COVID‐19 patients in Ethiopia. Methods A hospital‐based prospective cohort study involving 124 COVID‐19 cases was conducted at Eka Kotebe General Hospital, COVID‐19 Isolation and Treatment Center. The study participants were all symptomatic COVID‐19 adult patients admitted to the hospital from 18 March to 20 August 2020. Physicians at the centre recorded the data using a log sheet. Cox proportional‐hazards regression model was conducted. Statistical significance was defined at P < 0.05. Results A total of 124 symptomatic COVID‐19 patients with a mean age of 42 years (±17) were involved in the study. The median duration of symptom resolution of COVID‐19 was seven days with a minimum of two and a maximum of sixty‐eight days. Sex and body mass index (BMI) were statistically significant predictors of the symptom resolution. The hazard of having delayed sign or symptom resolution in males was 55% higher than in females (P = 0.039; CI: 0.22–0.96) and the hazard of delayed sign or symptom resolution in those with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was 35% higher than in those with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (P = 0.041; CI: 0.44–0.98]). Conclusions The median duration of COVID‐19 symptom resolution was seven days. Being male and/or having a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 were predictors of a delayed sign or symptom resolution time. Therefore, it is important to consider proportion of males and those with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 when preparing isolation and treatment centres. Males and individuals with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 shall also be given priority when shielding from the COVID‐19.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLifestyle MedicineSame topicLong-Term Effects of COVID-19French-language works237,207