L'utilisation du droit international dans les cours domestiques (François Larocque, Book Review of Using international law in Domestic Courts by Shaheed Fatima, Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2005 447)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
French Abstract: L’excellent ouvrage de reference de Shaheed Fatima regroupe, organise et decrit la jurisprudence domestique afferente au droit international. Selon l’auteur, Shaheed Fatima est une publiciste qualifiee dont l’avenir s’annonce tres prometteur ayant a la fois des exploits academiques impressionnants et une experience pratique fort diversifiee. Using International Law in Domestic Courts est un guide du praticien plutot qu’un traite analytique ou qu’un ouvrage de doctrine au sens classique. La jurisprudence du Royaume-Uni, de la Cour europeenne des droits de la personne, de la Cour europeenne de justice et de la Cour internationale de justice fonde l’ensemble de la matiere du livre. Malgre la deception de l’auteur face a la presentation de la coutume internationale releguee au dernier chapitre du tome et du fait qu’il faudrait decrire la Convention europeenne des droits de la personne comme Convention ayant ete partiellement mise en œuvre au Royaume-Uni par la Human Rights Act et non comme ayant ete indirectement mise en œuvre, Shaheed Fatima atteint son objectif de decrire l’etat du droit (et non de le commenter). L’auteur de la recension espere qu’un ouvrage de reference semblable axe sur le droit canadien sera eventuellement produit au Canada. English Abstract: Shaheed Fatima’s excellent reference work consolidates, organizes and describes domestic jurisprudence in international law. According to the author, Shaheed Fatima is a qualified publicist whose future appears to be very promising, with both impressive academic achievements and a very diversified practical experience. Using International Law in Domestic Courts is a practitioner’s guide rather than an analytical work or work of doctrine. The United Kingdom, the European Court of Human Rights, the European Court of Justice and the International Court of Justice jurisprudence constitutes the book’s foundation. Despite the author’s disappointment at the presentation of the international custom relegated to the last chapter of the volume and the fact that the European Convention on Human Rights should be described as partially implemented in the United Kingdom by the Human Rights Act and not as being indirectly implemented, Shaheed Fatima achieved her goal of describing the state of the law (rather than commenting on it). The author of the review hopes that a similar reference work focusing on Canadian law will eventually be produced in Canada.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".