MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195668624 · doi:10.1111/dme.14671

The bidirectional longitudinal association between depressive symptoms and HbA<sub>1c</sub>: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2021· review· en· W3195668624 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Magdalena Beran, Rutendo Muzambi, Anouk F.J. Geraets, Juan Rafael Albertorio‐Diaz, Marcel C. Adriaanse, Marjolein M. Iversen, Andrzej Kokoszka, Giesje Nefs, Arie Nouwen, Frans Pouwer, Jörg Huber, Andreas Schmitt, Miranda T. Schram

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetic Medicine · 2021
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversiteit Maastricht
KeywordsMedicineMeta-analysisAssociation (psychology)Depressive symptomsMEDLINEInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusEndocrinologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aim To investigate whether there is a bidirectional longitudinal association of depression with HbA 1c . Methods We conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL and EMBASE for observational, longitudinal studies published from January 2000 to September 2020, assessing the association between depression and HbA 1c in adults. We assessed study quality with the Newcastle‐Ottawa‐Scale. Pooled effect estimates were reported as partial correlation coefficients (r p ) or odds ratios (OR). Results We retrieved 1642 studies; 26 studies were included in the systematic review and eleven in the meta‐analysis. Most studies (16/26) focused on type 2 diabetes. Study quality was rated as good (n = 19), fair (n = 2) and poor (n = 5). Of the meta‐analysed studies, six investigated the longitudinal association between self‐reported depressive symptoms and HbA 1c and five the reverse longitudinal association, with a combined sample size of n = 48,793 and a mean follow‐up of 2 years. Higher levels of baseline depressive symptoms were associated with subsequent higher levels of HbA 1c (partial r = 0.07; [95% CI 0.03, 0.12]; I 2 38%). Higher baseline HbA 1c values were also associated with 18% increased risk of (probable) depression (OR = 1.18; [95% CI 1.12,1.25]; I 2 0.0%). Conclusions Our findings support a bidirectional longitudinal association between depressive symptoms and HbA 1c . However, the observed effect sizes were small and future research in large‐scale longitudinal studies is needed to confirm this association. Future studies should investigate the role of type of diabetes and depression, diabetes distress and diabetes self‐management behaviours. Our results may have clinical implications, as depressive symptoms and HbA 1c levels could be targeted concurrently in the prevention and treatment of diabetes and depression. Registration PROSPERO ID CRD42019147551.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.020
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.052
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.108

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0200.052
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0180.033
Bibliometrics0.0060.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations79
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetic MedicineSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207