Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Bahasa Indonesia melalui Media Audiovisual pada Siswa Kelas III Sekolah Dasar
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This Classroom Action Research is to improve learning outcomes of Indonesian language lessons on the theme of growth and development of living things in third grade students of SD Negeri Karangbandung 02, Keanggungan District, Brebes Regency using audiovisual media. In this model, classroom action research is carried out through four stages, namely planning, action implementation, observation, and reflection and is carried out in two cycles. From this class action research, it was obtained that the average pre-cycle score of students was 59.64 with a completeness percentage of 39.28%. In the first cycle it increased to 63.21 with a completeness percentage of 57.14%. In the second cycle the average score of students became 66.96 with a completeness percentage of 71.42%. Based on the data obtained, it can be concluded that the use of audiovisual media can improve learning outcomes of Indonesian language with the theme of growth and development of living things in third grade students of SD Negeri Karangbandung 02, Keanggungan District, Brebes Regency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".