Relationship Between Disease Occurrence, Feeding Management and Return Over Feed in Ontario Dairy Herds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
On a worldwide basis, dairy industries of most countries are becoming increasingly concerned with factors that impact return on investment. Historically, research has focused on the relationship between management, production-limiting disease and milk production. However, few studies have quantified their association with herd economics.
 The objectives of this research are to examine the relationship between profitability as measured by the Ontario Dairy Herd Improvement (DHI) Corporation's Return over Feed (ROF) index, and herd characteristics such as milk production, somatic cell count linear score and health management practices. The ROF index will also be used to assess on-farm health and disease information that includes lameness, clinical ketosis, clinical mastitis, retained placenta (RP), displaced abomasum (DA), milk fever, monensin use and ration particle size. Herd level incidence risks for subclinical ketosis and subclinical mastitis will be evaluated by using the California Mastitis Test and the KetoTestO ketone test in early postpartum cows. Subsequently, the associations between the risk of disease, management factors and ROF will be determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".