MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195901028 · doi:10.82308/43184

Theoretical astronomy in the early modern Ottoman empire: Ali al-Qushji's «Al-Risala al-Fathiyya»

2020· article· en· W3195901028 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Hasan Umut

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersIstanbul Teknik ÜniversitesiBoğaziçi ÜniversitesiMcGill University
KeywordsOttoman empireAstronomyAncient historyClassicsPhilosophyHistoryAstrobiologyPhysicsPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This dissertation aims to demonstrate the importance of Al-Risāla al-Fatḥiyya (The Treatise of Conquest) in the history of theoretical astronomy (ʿilm al-hayʾa) in Islamic societies, especially in the Ottoman context. It was written by ʿAlī al-Qūshjī (d. 879/1474), one of the eminent scholars of his period, and dedicated to the Ottoman Sultan Meḥmed II to honor his victory over the Āq Qoyūnlū ruler Uzun Ḥasan in the Otlukbeli War in 878/1473. Originally from Samarqand, Qūshjī was trained by leading Timurid scholars, and became a prominent member of the Samarqand observatory and madrasa, two prestigious institutions built by Ulugh Beg, the then governor of Transoxiana. During this period, Qūshjī also contributed to the preparation of Zīj-i Ulugh Beg, one of the most important astronomical tables produced in the pre-modern world. Towards the end of his life, upon the invitation of the Sultan, Qūshjī emigrated to Istanbul, where he died after a short sojourn.The literature on the history of Islamic astronomy and Ottoman science has assumed the significance of Qūshjī’s scientific activities and works, but only a small amount of research has dealt with them. Although the Fatḥiyya was one of Qūshjī’s last works, which he continued to revise until his death, modern literature has made little effort to situate it within its historical, local, and scientific contexts. This situation stems, in part, from the lack of a critical edition of this work. As a contribution to studies on Qūshjī and the Fatḥiyya, this dissertation deals with them in two main parts. Part 1 includes three chapters. Chapter 1 offers a literature review of Qūshjī studies that deals not only with astronomy but, more generally, with his scholarly output that has attracted attention in modern scholarship. Chapter 2 addresses Qūshjī’s intellectual biography, introducing his educational background and scholarly activities with reference to the intellectual, political, and social dynamics of the localities in which he flourished. Chapter 3 attempts to scrutinize the Fatḥiyya with respect to the historical, local, and scientific contexts within which it was written. It also analyses the evolution of the Fatḥiyya, especially in regard to Qūshjī’s other hayʾa work, Risālah dar hayʾah, that was written earlier in Persian. Additionally, this chapter investigates how Qūshjī was engaged with earlier authoritative hayʾa works in his Fatḥiyya project. Part 2 includes four chapters: a description of the manuscripts and editorial procedures; an Arabic edition of the Fatḥiyya; an English translation; and a commentary on the Fatḥiyya

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.933
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueeScholarship@McGill (McGill)Same topicHistorical Astronomy and Related StudiesFrench-language works237,207