MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195921899 · doi:10.1289/isee.2021.p-168

Associations of urinary microbiome profiles with gestational diabetes mellitus in an Oklahoma case-control study

2021· article· en· W3195921899 on OpenAlexaff
Wei‐Jen Chen, Candace Robledo, Erin M. Davis, Cecil M. Lewis, Krithivasan Sankaranarayanan, Hélène Carabin, Michael P. Anderson, LaTasha B. Craig, Jean R. Goodman, Jennifer D. Peck

Bibliographic record

VenueISEE Conference Abstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrobiomeGestational diabetesBiologyOdds ratioPhysiologyRelative species abundanceCase-control studyInternal medicineMedicinePregnancyObstetricsEcologyBioinformaticsGestationAbundance (ecology)Genetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Previous research has demonstrated associations between the human placental, gut, and vaginal microbiome and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Recent findings suggest urine is a biomarker for integrated profiling of the genitourinary and amniotic microbiome. However, little is known about how urinary microbiome disturbances may relate to GDM. The present study aims to characterize and compare the urinary microbial profiles among pregnant women with and without GDM. METHODS: Bacterial DNA was extracted from mid-pregnancy urine obtained from a prevalence case-control study of 59 GDM cases and 206 controls from the University of Oklahoma Medical Center (August 2009 to May 2010). The taxonomic profile of the urinary microbiome was characterized by high-throughput sequencing of the V4 region of the microbial 16S rRNA gene. Associations between the microbial composition of taxa relative abundance and GDM were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression while controlling for maternal characteristics. Relative abundance (%) was categorized as absent, ≤median or median values. Alpha diversity (richness and evenness) and beta diversity (community structure) were also compared between cases and controls. RESULTS:A total of 27 microbial genera were identified in the cases and controls, which were predominated by the genera Lactobacillus and Gardnerella. The odds of a relative abundance median was decreased for the genus Aerococcus while it was increased for the genus Veillonella among the cases compared to the controls in the crude model. After adjusting for age and race, GDM cases had a decreased odds of higher relative abundance (median vs. absence) of Aerococcus compared to the controls, with the upper bound of the confidence interval (CI) marginally crossing 1.0 (adjusted odds ratio: 0.45, 95% CI 0.18, 1.10). No difference was observed in alpha and beta diversity metrics between cases and controls. CONCLUSIONS:Our hypothesis-generating results suggest the urinary microbiome composition may differ by GDM status. KEYWORDS: Microbiome, Pregnancy outcomes, Molecular epidemiology

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.682

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueISEE Conference AbstractsSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207