MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3195962672 · doi:10.3168/jdsc.2021-0137

Randomized controlled trial of pegbovigrastim as an adjunct therapy for naturally occurring severe clinical mastitis cases in dairy cows

2021· article· en· W3195962672 on OpenAlexafffund
J. Denis-Robichaud, Jean‐Philippe Roy, Sébastien Buczinski, Marjolaine Rousseau, M. Villettaz Robichaud, J. Dubuc

Bibliographic record

VenueJDS Communications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalService de Recherche et d'EXpertise en Transformation des Produits Forestiers
FundersUniversité de Montréal
KeywordsMedicineMastitisRandomized controlled trialInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The main objective of this study was to quantify the effect of pegbovigrastim (PEG) as an adjunct therapy for naturally occurring severe mastitis cases on survival, intramammary bacteriological cure, and subsequent milk production. A double-blinded, randomized controlled trial was conducted on a single commercial dairy farm. During the study period, all cows having a case of severe clinical mastitis, defined as the presence of abnormal milk and inflammation in one quarter or more combined with the presence of systemic signs (pyrexia, dehydration, or recumbency), were enrolled in the study. In addition to a standardized therapy combining systemic and intramammary antimicrobials as well as systemic anti-inflammatory drugs, cows received a subcutaneous injection of either 2.7 mL of 0.9% sterile saline (control group; CON) or 2.7 mL of PEG (PEG group). A milk sample for bacteriological analysis was taken before treatment was administered and a second sample was taken 14 d after enrollment. Survival (30 d post-treatment) and bacteriological cure (14 d post-treatment) were analyzed by survival analysis and chi-squared tests, respectively, whereas daily milk production was treated as a repeated measure in mixed regression models. The 77 cows enrolled in the study were of parity 2 to 4 (mean = 3) and between 3 and 302 d in milk (mean = 154). The bacteria identified in milk at enrollment were Klebsiella spp. (n = 48; 62%), Escherichia coli (n = 16; 21%), Enterobacter spp. (n = 10; 13%), or no growth (n = 3; 4%). The probability of survival during the first 30 d after treatment was higher in the PEG group (84%) than in the control group (46%). Daily milk production over the 30-d period following treatment and bacteriological cure 14 d post-treatment did not differ between groups. Overall, cows treated with PEG as an adjunct therapy for naturally occurring cases of severe clinical mastitis had a better survival than cows treated with saline.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.382
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJDS CommunicationsSame topicMilk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsFrench-language works237,207