Walking Psychotherapy As a Health Promotion Strategy to Improve Mental and Physical Health for Patients and Therapists: Clinical Open-Label Feasibility Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Persons with mental illness are more at risk for sedentary behaviour and associated consequences. We assessed the feasibility of outdoor walking during psychotherapy sessions in an outpatient trauma therapy program to challenge sedentary behaviour. METHODS: In this pilot trial in Toronto, Canada, female therapists and patients >18 years, were encouraged to walk during 12 consecutive trauma therapy sessions. Both groups were provided wearable pedometers. We assessed protocol feasibility and desirability, and 12-week changes in patient post-traumatic stress [PTSD check-list for DSM-5 (PCL-5)], and depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms [Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS)]. RESULTS: 91% (20/22) of patients approached for the study consented to participate and 17 (85%) completed follow-up questionnaires. There was walking in 132/197 (67%) of total therapy sessions (mean 7.3 out of 10.9 sessions per participant). Inclement weather was the predominant reason for in-office sessions. At 12-week follow-up, PCL-5 mean scores decreased from 38.4 [standard deviation, ((SD) 11.8) to 30.7 (SD 14.7)], [mean difference (MD) 7.7, 95% CI: 1.5 to 13.8]; 41% (7/17) participants had a clinically significant PCL-5 score reduction of >10 points. DASS-stress mean scores decreased from 19.0 to 16.0 (MD 3.0, 95% CI: 0.3 to 5.6). No changes were observed for DASS depression (MD -0.9, 95% CI: -5.1 to 3.3) nor DASS anxiety (MD -0.2, 95% CI: -3.1 to 2.7). Daily step reporting was inconsistent and not analyzed. There was high acceptability amongst patients and therapists to walk, but not to record daily steps. There were no adverse outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: It was feasible and acceptable to incorporate outdoor walking during trauma therapy sessions for patients and therapists. Weather was the greatest barrier to implementation. Further randomized-control study to compare seated and walking psychotherapy can clarify if there are psychotherapeutic and physical benefits with walking.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".