MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196292241 · doi:10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122813

Strategies for capturing Bacillus thuringiensis spores on surfaces of (001) GaAs-based biosensors

2021· article· en· W3196292241 on OpenAlexaff
Houman Moteshareie, Walid M. Hassen, Jonathan Vermette, Jan J. Dubowski, Azam F. Tayabali

Bibliographic record

VenueTalanta · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacillus and Francisella bacterial research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueHealth Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBacillus thuringiensisSporeBacillus cereusPolyclonal antibodiesMicrobiologyBiochipBacillus anthracisChemistryMonoclonal antibodyBiosensorAntibodyImmunoassayCereusRecombinant DNAEscherichia coliBiologyBacteriaGeneBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) is used as a bioinsecticide since it effectively kills insect larvae. Bt is also genetically similar to Bacillus cereus (Bc), a well recognized foodborne human pathogen; they are both members of the Bacillus cereus group (BC group). Although approved Bt bioinsecticide products have been confirmed to be non-pathogenic to humans, close monitoring of Bt during dissemination is important for cost considerations and to limit impact on biodiversity towards nontarget organisms. As such, developing rapid, sensitive, and specific tools for quantitative detection of Bt spores during and following spray operations is highly desirable. The goals of this study were to investigate commercially available detection reagents for sensitivity and selectivity in detecting Bt spores, and then functionalize a surface of (001) GaAs used in photonic biosensing. To achieve these goals, we (1) screened commercial antibodies for their capacity to bind recombinant proteins from Bt spores, (2) screened antibodies and aptamers for their sensitivity and selectivity against Bt spores, and (3) tested the efficiency of selected antibodies and aptamers in capturing Bt spores on the surface of functionalized GaAs biochips. Seven genes encoding Bt spore proteins were cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The binding of each purified spore antigen was tested by commercially available polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies claimed to exclusively target spores. Of the seven targets, Bacillus collagen-like protein A, was the most abundant protein on Bt spores and demonstrated the strongest binding affinity to all test antibodies. The commercial antibodies (Abs) were also tested for specificity to BC Group versus non-BC Group spores. Three of six commercial antibodies showed selectivity to Bt spores, with recombinant Abs providing the most robust lower range of detection (102 to 6 × 103 spores/mL). The sensitivity and selectivity of three published DNA aptamer sequences demonstrated a wide range of detection sensitivity for Bt spores. Two of the three test aptamers also showed reasonable selectivity towards Bt spores while the third demonstrated reactivity to non-BC Group B. megaterium and B. subtilis. Of the reagents tested, a thiolated aptamer and llama recombinant Ab showed highest Bt spore capture efficiency as measured by spore coverage of the GaAs surface. These results confirm that the selected aptamer and llama rAb can be considered strong candidates for the development of GaAs-based biosensing devices.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTalantaSame topicBacillus and Francisella bacterial researchFrench-language works237,207