MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Features of cognitive impairment in patients with chronic kidney disease stages 3A-5D: biological value of endothelial nitric oxide synthase.

2021· article· en· W3196348246 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
М. З. Гасанов, M. G. Panchenko, М. М. Batyushin, R. R. Gareev, A. A. Perfilieva

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology (Saint-Petersburg) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicNeurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicineSarcopeniaEnosEndothelial dysfunctionDialysisKidney diseaseCohortNitric oxide synthaseNitric oxideDiseaseCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

THE AIM: a comprehensive assessment of the frequency, severity, and composition of cognitive impairments (CI) in patients with CKD stages 3A-5D, as well as to study the relationship between the levels of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) and these impairments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 80 patients with CKD aged 26 to 79 years (mean age 58.9 ± 1.4 years), among them 43 women (mean age 60.1 ± 1.9 years) and 37 men (mean age 57.4 ± 2.3 years). All patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (pre-dialysis) included 40 patients (28 women and 12 men) with CKD 3A-5 (mean age 59.9 ± 2.1 years), group 2 (on dialysis) included 40 patients (18 women and 22 men) with CKD 5D (mean age 58.1 ± 2.1 years). Sarcopenia was verified according to the criteria of the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). The presence and severity of CI were determined using the short mental status assessment scale (MMSE) and the Montreal cognitive assessment test (MoCA). To identify endothelial dysfunction, all patients underwent a test with endothelium-dependent vasodilation of the brachial artery, as well as determination of the level of eNOS (ELISA Kit, USA) in serum. RESULTS: The prevalence of sarcopenia in the 1st group was 12.5 %, and in the 2nd group, 42.5 %. The average age of patients with sarcopenia was 66.1 ± 2.1 years. The prevalence of CI according to the MoCA scale in the general cohort was 70 %, while in the 1st group – 67.5 %, in the second – 72.5 %, in the subgroup with sarcopenia – 76.2 %. CIs, determined by the MMSE scale, were on average in 67.5 % of the surveyed, and the quantitative prevalence in the groups was identical, however, the qualitative composition of CIs in the comparative analysis differed in the severity of manifestations. In a comparative assessment of the prevalence of CI (according to the MMSE scale) in patients with sarcopenia, it was found that this indicator was significantly higher than in the subgroup without sarcopenia and amounted to 90.5 % and 59.3 %, respectively. In patients with sarcopenia, the level of eNOS was lower than the mean values compared with the general sample, patients of the 1st group and the subgroup without sarcopenia (0.75 ± 0.1 ng / ml, 0.88 ± 0.1 ng / ml, 1 ± 0.1 ng / ml and 0.92 ± 0.2 ng / ml, respectively (p = 0.02)). According to the results of the test with endothelium-dependent vasodilation, the prevalence of endothelial dysfunction in the total cohort of patients was 48.8 % (in the 1st group – 27.5 %, and in the 2nd group – 70 % (p = 0.001)), in the subgroup of patients with sarcopenia – 57.1 %. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of CI was found in patients with CKD. The progression of CKD is associated with the formation of endothelial dysfunction and the development of CI. The latter significantly impairs the quality and life expectancy of patients. The main mechanism of their development is increasing endothelial dysfunction, and eNOS plays a key role in this process. Sarcopenia is associated with an increased risk of CI, regardless of the studied population and the criteria for the diagnosis of sarcopenia, and plays an important prognostic value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology (Saint-Petersburg)Same topicNeurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207