MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3196395906 · doi:10.1109/jlt.2021.3107774

Reinforcement Learning for Compensating Power Excursions in Amplified WDM Systems

2021· article· en· W3196395906 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Lightwave Technology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
FundersAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsExcursionReinforcement learningComputer scienceWavelength-division multiplexingOptical amplifierReduction (mathematics)Power (physics)Channel (broadcasting)Electronic engineeringWavelengthControl theory (sociology)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsControl (management)OpticsPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wavelength-dependent power excursions in gain-controlled erbium doped fiber amplifiers (EDFA) is a challenging issue in optical networks. We investigate a launch channel power control method using reinforcement learning (RL) to mitigate the power excursions of EDFA systems. A machine learning engine is developed, trained and evaluated with four different policy-gradient RL algorithms that are compared according to two main criteria: achieved power excursion reduction and learning time. Different scenarios are considered with 12-, 24-, 40- active channels at fixed wavelengths and with variable number of active channels (between 12 and 64) assigned randomly at different wavelengths during RL process. We show 62% power excursion reduction in the 40-channel scenario and 28% in the variable scenario, which demonstrates the promising role of online RL approach for controlling power excursion in EDFA systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it