Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hip fracture is a major public health problem in many developed nations. An estimated 30,000 hip fractures occur each year in Canada. To initiate adequate preventive measures, a thorough understanding of hip fracture patients' characteristics and the healthcare services they receive over the continuum of care is warranted. The global objective of this thesis is to contribute to our knowledge base concerning current and future needs, gaps, and solutions to provide optimal care for people with hip fractures.The first part describes the recovery process of patients with hip fractures and its definition. A post acute cohort was followed up to a one year after fracture and the patients' course of recovery was characterized using two methods to define recovery. This study demonstrated that the degree and time course of functional recovery after hip fracture varied on the basis of definition and the pre-fracture functional status. Despite the initial improvement, the functional status of the patients declined following cessation of rehabilitation services.Studying hip fracture patients' care and recovery at a single site over a limited time led to investigating the characteristics of the broader hip fracture population in the province of Quebec. What do we know about hip fracture trends, changes in health profile, and what might this information mean for the future? This guided the author to use an administrative database (Med-Echo) to answer these questions. The results confirmed the hypothesis that the hip fracture population is becoming frailer, which will increase the resources needed, and that the population's health profile differed on the basis of age and sex.The inside-hospital mortality rate and the proportion of patients who are discharged to rehabilitation after fracture are declining over time; consequently, increases the demand on community services. Finding the gaps and describing the needs is the first step to improve the quality of care, but this is not adequate. Therefore, the last part proposes potential solutions. A systematic review aimed at finding solutions to the previously identified gaps, specifically, the fact that hip fracture patients' functional status deteriorates following cessation of rehabilitation and that the need for community rehabilitation services will increase. Therefore, the reported effect in the literature of an extended exercise rehabilitation program was reviewed and quantified. This meta-analysis is the first to show that a clinically significant functional improvement can be gained later than is usually believed with elderly hip fracture patients. Such an improvement suggests that there is no 'plateau' for recovery. Finally, the methodology to evaluate and create a comprehensive program to serve hip fracture patients over the continuum of care is discussed and a simulated multidisciplinary program is proposed as a model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".