Rib Hump Deformity Correction in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Comparison of Three Spinal Fusion Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of the present study is to control the hypothesis that the rib hump deformity can be adequately corrected when applying vertebral derotation. We retrospectively studied patients treated with full pedicle screw systems (group A), hybrid constructs (group B), and Harrington rod instrumentation (group C). No costoplasties were performed in the patients included in our study. Derotation was applied in groups A and B. The rib hump deformity was assessed on lateral radiographic studies by rib index (RI). Of the 72 patients that were finally included in our study, 30 patients (24 females and 6 males; mean age, 14.5 ± 2.2 years) were treated with a full pedicle screw system, 23 patients (19 females and 4 males; mean age, 13.8 ± 1.9 years) were treated with a hybrid construct, and 19 patients (16 females and 3 males; mean age, 14.3 ± 2 years) received the Harrington rod instrumentation. In all groups RI was significantly corrected after surgery. Before surgery no difference in RI was found among groups; however, after surgery RI was found significantly higher in group C as compared to groups A and B. The between-group analysis revealed that the correction of RI, and thereby the rib hump deformity correction, did not significantly differ among the three patient groups. In conclusion, it cannot be suggested based on the present study that vertebral derotation alone can offer an adequate correction of the rib hump deformity. Further, the development of rib cage deformity and its degree of interdependence with the scoliotic spinal deformity has to be further investigated and assessed, as it seems that it may not necessarily result directly from the primary vertebral deformity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".