The Extent of Youth Victimization, Crime and Delinquency in Alberta, 1999
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This report provides information about youth victimization, crime and delinquency in Alberta. In-school surveys of youth aged 12 to 18 years living in selected larger cities, smaller cities and towns and rural areas were conducted in 1999. The findings presented in this report describe students' perceptions of youth crime and personal safety, victimization experiences occurring while at school and outside of school over the past year, lifetime and past year involvement in delinquent behaviours, prevalence of weapon possession at school, and contact with the police and criminal justice system. The survey instrument was designed to collect data on variables related to major social and psychological environmental factors known to be associated with youth victimization and delinquency using a self-report method. Besides measures of prevalence of youth victimization and delinquency, additional information was gathered to describe the context of the experience for the most serious incidents that occurred over the past year. While findings in this report include all of the 2,001 respondents, two additional reports have been prepared in order to provide more in depth analyses of Calgary and of Edmonton students. These reports are titled: The Extent of Youth Victimization, Crime and Delinquency in Alberta, 1999: Summary of Calgary Findings; and The Extent of Youth Victimization, Crime and Delinquency in Alberta, 1999: Summary of Edmonton Findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".