Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Data science growing success relies on knowing where a relevant dataset exists, understanding its impact on a specific task, finding ways to enrich a dataset, and leveraging insights derived from it. With the growth of open data initiatives, data scientists need an extensible set of effective discovery operations to find relevant data from their enterprise datasets accessible via data discovery systems or open datasets accessible via data portals. Existing portals and systems suffer from limited discovery support and do not track the use of a dataset and insights derived from it. We will demonstrate KGLac, a system that captures metadata and semantics of datasets to construct a knowledge graph (GLac) interconnecting data items, e.g., tables and columns. KGLac supports various data discovery operations via SPARQL queries for table discovery, unionable and joinable tables, plus annotation with related derived insights. We harness a broad range of Machine Learning (ML) approaches with GLac to enable automatic graph learning for advanced and semantic data discovery. The demo will showcase how KGLac facilitates data discovery and enrichment while developing an ML pipeline to evaluate potential gender salary bias in IT jobs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it