The crystal structure of Tl2.36Sb5.98As4.59S17, the lead-free endmember of the chabournéite homeotypic group
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT The crystal structure of Tl2.36Sb5.98As4.59S17, the lead-free endmember of the chabournéite homeotypic group, from the Tl-As-Sb-rich gold deposit at Vorontsovskoye (the Urals, Russia) was determined and refined to R(obs) 0.099 for 9340 unique observed X-ray reflections. The triclinic unit-cell parameters determined from single-crystal data are as follows: a = 8.63253(19) Å, b = 16.3055(7) Å, c = 21.8196(8) Å, α = 75.094 (3)°, β = 83.631(2)°, γ = 89.303 (2)°, V = 2949.18(18) Å3 (Z = 4), space group . The crystal structure is composed of (001) slabs based on PbS and SnS archetypes, arranged in regular alternation. All Sb(As) coordination polyhedra are (Sb,As)S3+2+(1 or 2) coordination pyramids, in the majority of cases with a mixed Sb-As occupancy in both slab types. Bond-length distributions were studied in detail. The zig-zag boundary between the slabs is composed of a repeating sequence of [100] Tl-Tl, Sb-Sb (1/3 substituted by As), Tl-Tl, and Tl-Sb columns. Thallium forms tricapped trigonal coordination prisms and (Sb,As) forms bicapped prisms. Differences compared to two related structures—parapierrotite and tsygankoite—are specified. Twinning of chabournéite is connected with the (imperfect) order-disorder character of the structure, which is connected with the configurations observed on slab boundaries. The structure refinement of the lead-free Tl-(Sb,As) chabournéite endmember presented in this paper is the best starting point for a restudy of all complexities of the chabournéite homeotypic group.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it