Infection-related immunoglobulin A nephropathy or IgA-dominant postinfectious glomerulonephritis; what is in a name?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Immunoglobulin A nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common glomerulonephritis worldwide. However, its incidence and prevalence vary depending on racial and geographical factors. IgAN is a highly heterogeneous disease with wide clinical and pathological variability. The defining and consistent feature of IgAN is the dominance or co-dominance of IgA deposits in the glomeruli on immunofluorescence (IF) microscopy. However, recent reports suggest that a number of post-infectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN) cases also exhibit dominance or co-dominance of IgA deposits on IF microscopy. Therefore, a debate has arisen on labeling these cases either as infection-related IgAN (a form of secondary IgAN) or IgA-dominant PIGN. Although the majority favors the later nosology, this issue has remained unresolved, as is the issue of labelling this condition as PIGN when, in fact, the infection is often intercurrent, and no latent period is found in this condition. This brief narrative review aims to discuss the salient features of this condition and issues related to its nomenclature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".