Abstract P128: Direct Observed Therapy In Suspected Resistant Hypertension Is Safe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Direct observed therapy (DOT) has emerged as a method for assessment of adherence, particularly in patients with apparent treatment-resistant hypertension (ATRH), in clinical care as well as research. We have previously demonstrated that direct observed therapy resulted in controlled hypertension in 30% of patients with ATRH. In this study we report on the safety of DOT in terms of change in blood pressure (BP) and hypotensive symptoms. Methods: Patients with ATRH were enrolled in a prospective study of DOT, which was followed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the same day and at one month. DOT was performed by administering all prescribed BP lowering drugs, supervised by a nurse in an outpatient clinic setting. BP and vitals were measured at baseline and every 30 minutes until BP plateau based on two consecutive BP readings. All BP measurements during DOT were performed using an automated oscillometric BP device. In this study, we report the change in BP during DOT, with incidence of orthostatic symptoms, and decrease in systolic BP > 20 mm Hg as outcomes of interest. Results: 50 patients underwent DOT, 32 men, mean age 62 years on median 4 BP lowering drugs (range 3 to 7). The mean baseline BP was 146/77 mm Hg , and the lowest BP during DOT was 129/68 mm Hg. The median decrease in systolic BP was 14 mm Hg (range 0 to 60) and diastolic BP was 8 mm Hg (range 0 to 37). 5 patients (10%) developed orthostatic symptoms during DOT, none of which required any interventions, and resolved with continued observation. A decrease of > 20 mm Hg in systolic BP was seen in 19 patients (38%), and a systolic BP of < 110 mm Hg was seen in only 6 patients (12%). Conclusions: DOT caused decrease in BP by >20 mmHg in about 40% of patients. While these large acute decreases in BP were largely asymptomatic, close observation of BP is required until peak BP lowering effect wanes. As decrease in BP is driven by the degree of non-adherence and number of prescribed BP lowering drugs, our safety record has limitation dictated by the number of subjects enrolled, and relatively small number of patients with more than 5 BP lowering drugs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".