Correspondence on ‘Role of AMPK/mTOR-independent autophagy in clear cell renal cell carcinoma’ by Radovanovic <i>et al</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dear Editor, We have read this article published in the Journal of Investigative Medicine with great interest. In this paper, Radovanovic et al 1 investigated macroautophagy (hereafter autophagy) and apoptosis focusing on the regulatory roles of 5'-adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) and mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). They showed autophagy induction (uncoordinated protein 51-like kinase 1 (ULK1) phosphorylation, LC3 lipidation and p62 degradation) in ccRCC compared with normal renal cells. Interestingly, the active form of AMPK was shown to be lower in ccRCC whereas the phosphorylated form of initiation factor 4E-binding protein 1 (4EBP1), the substrate of mTOR, was increased. Therefore, they concluded that autophagy was executed independent of the AMPK and mTOR pathway. Autophagy is responsible for degradation and recycling of impaired organelles and cytosolic misfolded proteins to maintain cellular function.2 The autophagy process is executed by autophagy related (ATG) proteins. mTOR is one …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".