The effect of low intensity pulsed ultrasound on mandibular condylar growth in young adult rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a need for more effective methods to enhance mandibular growth in young adults with mandibular deficiency. Previous studies suggest that low intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) can enhance mandibular growth in growing individuals. This study aimed to evaluate the potential growth changes of the mandible following 4-week LIPUS application in young adult rats. Nineteen ≈120-day-old female rats were allocated to experimental (n = 10) and control (n = 9) groups. The animals in the experimental group were treated with LIPUS to their temporomandibular joints (TMJs) bilaterally, 20 min each day for 28 consecutive days. Animals were then euthanized; gross morphological evaluation was performed on 2D photographs and 3D virtual models of hemi-mandibles, and microstructural assessment was done for the mandibular condyle (MC). Evaluation of mineralization and microarchitecture properties of subchondral cancellous bone was performed by micro-computed tomography (μCT) scanning. Qualitative and histomorphometric analysis was done on condylar cartilage and subchondral bone following Alcian Blue/PAS and Goldner's Trichrome staining. Vital flourochrome (calcein green) labeling was also utilized to determine the amount of endochondral bone growth. Gross morphological evaluations showed a slight statistically non-significant increase especially in the main condylar growth direction in the LIPUS group. Moreover, 3D evaluation depicted an enhanced periosteal bone apposition at the site of LIPUS application. Microstructural analysis revealed that LIPUS stimulates both chondrogenesis and osteogenesis and enhances endochondral bone formation in young adult rat MC. Furthermore, the effect of LIPUS on osteogenic cells of subchondral cancellous bone was notable. To conclude, LIPUS can enhance young adult rats' MC residual growth potential.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".