On the Stability of Talc in Subduction Zones: A Possible Control on the Maximum Depth of Decoupling Between the Subducting Plate and Mantle Wedge
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Geophysical observations including surface heat flow data indicate the subducting slab becomes fully coupled to the overlying mantle wedge at ∼70–80 km depth. This maximum depth of decoupling (MDD) separates cool, stagnant forearc mantle from warmer, convecting mantle capable of generating arc magmas. Thermodynamic calculations demonstrate that talc is stable in H 2 O‐undersaturated parts of the mantle wedge where its stability is controlled by the pressure‐dependent, fluid‐absent reaction: talc + forsterite = antigorite + enstatite, which occurs at pressures ∼2–2.5 GPa (∼70–80 km depth) and temperatures <650°C. At shallower depths, H 2 O‐undersaturated portions of the basal mantle wedge contain talc, which experimental studies show dramatically weakens rocks. At greater depths, talc is restricted to silica‐rich portions of the mantle wedge. The common MDD in subduction zones may reflect the downdip transition from a talc‐present decoupled shear zone to a talc‐absent fully coupled interface along the base of the mantle wedge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".